Skip to main content
August 21, 2026

Everyone’s racing to fix content. We’re betting on the foundations first.

Leigh Gammons

Managing Director & SVP

Illustration Graphics1

Share on

Over the next year, I suspect most of our industry is going to have an argument about content. How much of it to produce, how to optimise it in an increasingly AI-first world and whether the old digital playbooks still apply. It's an understandable argument to want to have. It's also, I think, the wrong one to have first.

Underneath every one of those content questions is a harder, less comfortable one: does the system the content sits on top of actually deserve to be trusted? Is there one governed source of truth behind what a brand is claiming, or a dozen versions scattered across regions, departments, and platforms that happen to mostly agree? Is the experience designed to hold up when it shows up somewhere you didn't build and can't control? Does anyone in the organisation actually have the authority to say which version of a fact is the right one? 

Those aren't content questions. They're architecture questions, design questions, and operating model questions, and they have to be answered first, because no amount of good writing can fix a broken foundation underneath it. 

We've spent the last few months discussing the role of websites in the future and we’re building our own point of view on this, which we're calling "Clicks to Context", with our strategy, technology, design, and consultancy leads each taking the piece of the argument that sits inside what they actually do. We think the agencies and consultancies who serve clients well over the next few years will be the ones who can genuinely operate across all four of those disciplines at once, not just the ones with the sharpest content calendar or snippet strategy. 

No one can yet guarantee a brand gets cited by an AI system, nor is that the end of the journey. Earned, third-party sources currently carry more weight than anything a brand publishes about itself, and the infrastructure behind structured knowledge and machine-readable standards is real but still early. What we can offer instead is getting the architecture, governance, and experience right now, so that whatever comes next, our clients aren't rebuilding the foundations under pressure. 

That's the thinking behind this series, and it starts with our Chief Strategy Officer, Nadine Clarke, in the piece that follows, on why this is a systems problem before it's ever a content one.